From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu Sun Nov 27 16:49:11 1994
Message-Id: <199411272149.AA18118@nfs2.digex.net>
Date: Sun Nov 27 16:49:11 1994
From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject:      Re: solutions to sumti opacity
Status: RO

> UC>"Gerku" doesn't involve sumti raising. "Klama" probably does, but this
> UC>never causes problems because there is no intentionality.
>
> Never?  Last weekend, mi klama lo diklo ke djacu ckana zarci having identified
> 2 propspects in the phone book.  Both turned out to be out-of-business
> and hence our klama-ing turned out to be very intentional and not very
> realizable %^) (we did find a not-so-local store).
>
> lojbab

This, of course, will be the solution that finally wins: no marking
for opaque references, and let context determine the meaning.
It is nice to know that at least in theory there is a way to be
more explicit, though.

Jorge