Message-Id: <199411111334.AA25924@nfs2.digex.net>
From: i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
Date: Fri Nov 11 08:34:59 1994
Subject:      Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Fri Nov 11 08:34:59 1994
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu

cu'u la djan. kau,n.
> A note:  "re lo'e nanmu" doesn't mean "two typical men", it means "two
> instances of the abstraction called 'the typical man'" and is semantically
> unsound, since there is only one such objective abstraction.  (If it isn't
> objective, then "le'e" is wanted, and "re le'e nanmu" is fine.)

Well, we need some way of saying "two typical men".  Does {lo'e re nanmu}
work?

mu'o mi'e .i,n.