Return-Path: Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rLSig-00007MC; Sat, 24 Dec 94 11:24 EET Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id LAA02236 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 1994 11:24:57 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (MAILER@SEARN) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-13 #2494) id <01HL0M4Y75XC000AHB@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Sat, 24 Dec 1994 09:24:04 +0200 (EET) Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9973; Sat, 24 Dec 1994 10:21:46 +0100 Date: Sat, 24 Dec 1994 04:22:59 -0500 From: Logical Language Group Subject: sepi'o? lujvo? Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: Logical Language Group Message-id: <01HL0M4Z39KM000AHB@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1690 Lines: 34 Nick: >I disagree. I think the picture will be far messier for non-agentives; >while such rafsi will exist, I'm sure, picking the right one will be >more brain strain than it's worth, whereas {jai} will make life much >easier. I'd advocate leaving the jai-lujvo vague, and making >meaningful-rafsi paraphrases the disambiguations for it. As an example, >do you feel comfortable saying {le rokci cu popyselpi'o le canko}? What >if the rock just fell, instead of being dropped? For that matter, does >{sepi'o} imply that a {le pilno} exists? (I don't think so. And this >should be documented somewhere.) Nora agrees with you that sepi'o does not imply le pilno; I am ambivalent, siunce I habitually avoid deciding semantics issues outside of context. But I would say that le se pilno DOES imply le pilno, and "selpi'o" in the lujvo you used is based on the selbri, not the BAI. I would not feel comfortable with "le rokci cu popyselpi'o le canko" if it 'just fell' (and just because of the illegal hyphen %^). I wouldn;t phrase it that way either, but rather something like "le rokci cu popygre le canko" (not checking place structures, mind you - I prefer to use my instincts when coining lujvo on the fly, and check when it really matters). Both lujvo of course beg the question as to whether it is the rock or the window that shatters (or both). >About time I did revisit that paper of mine, huh. Ok, I'll see what I >can do this January. And don't forget umpteen bazillion new lujvo in your queue - with a host more waiting in the wings based on Jorge and Goran and Chris's endless conversation, I should guess %^). What was that abotu 5 months email backlog %^)? lojbab