Return-Path: Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rIaBB-00007DC; Fri, 16 Dec 94 12:46 EET Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id MAA24806 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 1994 12:46:27 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (MAILER@SEARN) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-7 #2494) id <01HKPIN591KG000944@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Fri, 16 Dec 1994 10:45:29 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 1036; Fri, 16 Dec 1994 11:43:18 +0100 Date: Fri, 16 Dec 1994 12:45:24 +0200 From: Veijo Vilva Subject: Re: some help needed Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Message-id: <01HKPIN5ZXS6000944@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 703 Lines: 23 la lojbab cusku di'e > Date: Fri, 16 Dec 1994 05:38:48 -0500 > From: Logical Language Group > Subject: Re: some help needed > > OK. If weird to us who have never used preposed relative clauses. I never >though they would be used like this. But, hey Lojban seems to be growing >byond my ken all the time. I already used it in one of my Cafe stories just after the introduction of the preposed relatives. At that time Colin - who was the principal architect of the preposed relatives - said he'd never thought they'd be used that way. > lojbab co'o mi'e veion --------------------------------- .i mi du la'o sy. Veijo Vilva sy. ---------------------------------