Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rEaEI-00007RC; Mon, 5 Dec 94 12:01 EET Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 5009; Sat, 03 Dec 94 04:23:20 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 5008; Sat, 3 Dec 1994 04:23:19 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8888; Sat, 3 Dec 1994 03:19:19 +0100 Date: Fri, 2 Dec 1994 13:46:48 EST Reply-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Sender: Lojban list From: Jorge Llambias Subject: Re: cmavo hit-list To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu Content-Length: 2106 Lines: 50 la kris cusku di'e > > da'e da'u de'e de'u do'i > > > >They also seem too many. It would be nice if they could refer to > >only part of a bridi, like the inside of an abstraction. > > I've only used "di'u" and "di'e" (which you don't include here because > they're obviously useful). I wish there was something that could refer to > *several* sentences, because I often want to refer vaguely to a previous > block of discourse without really pinpointing one sentence. That's what {di'u} does, it refers to whole utterances, which could consist of more than one bridi. But I don't think it can refer to part of a bridi. For example, if someone says {mi jinvi le du'u ba carvi}, then is {mi tugni la'e di'u} a good response? Am I agreeing that it will rain, or that the first speaker thinks so? > > nu'e (vocative) > > > >Why is this a vocative? It doesn't seem to have anything to do > >with the others. > > It should probably be an evidential, but I think it's useful to have > "promise" as something other than just the bridi "nupre", to distinguish "I > have a promise that I've made/will make" from "I hereby promise". I think > "mi nupre lenu prami do" would not be as good as "nu'e mi ba prami > do" or maybe "ca'e mi nupre lenu prami do". Is nu'e only good for future events, or can it be used for things like "I swear I didn't do it"? Does it only mean "I promise", or a more general "you have my word of honour that what I say is the truth". > The dau/fei/gai I like because we've got so many things, like months and > hours, that come in twelves. Many? The only other one I can think of is eggs. And for hours, it is doubtful that they are useful, if you want to use a base twelve system you can't use gai, which is pano in base twelve. > Sometimes I can't find a UI I need, but when I sit down to list the ones > that are missing I can never remember what they were. .i ku'i le cmavo be > zo .ui poi mi nitcu cu na'o zasti I'm sure you don't mean that those cmavo exist only most of the time. You are preobably referring to {so'e le cmavo poi do nitcu}. Jorge