Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rEaEZ-00007fC; Mon, 5 Dec 94 12:01 EET
Message-Id: <m0rEaEZ-00007fC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 8817; Sat, 03 Dec 94 07:28:18 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 8814; Sat, 3 Dec 1994 07:28:16 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 1262; Sat, 3 Dec 1994 06:22:52 +0100
Date:         Fri, 2 Dec 1994 20:36:52 EST
Reply-To:     jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject:      Re: cmavo hit-list
To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
Content-Length: 375
Lines: 11

And:
> The new millenium will be celebrated, I predict, at the change
> from 19.9.9 to 20.0.0, rather than at the end of the 2000th year.

This very topic is currently under discussion in soc.culture.esperanto

My prediction is that it will be celebrated both Dec 31 1999 and
Dec 31 2000. Since there are partisans for both dates, why not
have big parties both times?

Jorge