Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rHzPR-00007DC; Wed, 14 Dec 94 21:30 EET Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id VAA18359 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 1994 21:30:43 +0200 Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI (MAILER@FINHUTC) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-7 #2494) id <01HKN8DFPMLS00046E@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Wed, 14 Dec 1994 19:29:44 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 4932; Wed, 14 Dec 1994 21:30:52 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6568; Wed, 14 Dec 1994 20:27:32 +0100 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 1994 14:32:08 -0500 (EST) From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Subject: Re: jei Sender: Lojban list Reply-to: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Message-id: <01HKN8DFQDWY00046E@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 488 Lines: 15 > > What would have been nice is that {du'u} be a monosyllable, but I guess > > it's too late for that. > > You always have the option of speaking a different dialect of Lojban & > hoping it catches on. For example, you could start using "jei" as a > general replacement of "duhu". > --- > And No, that would be too confusing. It's hard enough as it is to protest against the double meaning that {jei} has had. It would be impossible if I started using it with a third meaning. Jorge