From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu Fri Dec 16 05:25:30 1994
Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by nfs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA16317
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>); Fri, 16 Dec 1994 05:25:27 -0500
Message-Id: <199412161025.AA16317@nfs1.digex.net>
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 0783; Fri, 16 Dec 94 05:25:17 EST
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3075; Fri, 16 Dec 1994 05:25:08 -0500
Date:         Fri, 16 Dec 1994 12:22:34 +0200
Reply-To: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Subject:      Re: some help needed
To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
Status: RO

la lojbab cusku di'e
> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 1994 05:12:15 -0500
> From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
> Subject: Re: some help needed
>
>> What is the difference (except in brevity, of course; I'm not talking about
>> that now) between
>>
>> da,   as defined by {da poi du'u broda}, and
>>
>> ko'a, as defined by {lo goi ko'a du'u broda}
>>
>>co'o mi'e. goran.
>
> Well, your second sentence is ungrammatical.

 Not so.

   {lo goi ko'a du'u broda} is a legal (= parsing), preposed relative
   form of {lo du'u broda goi ko'a}

> lojbab


--

  co'o mi'e veion

---------------------------------
.i mi du la'o sy. Veijo Vilva sy.
---------------------------------