From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu Fri Dec 16 17:03:02 1994 Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by nfs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA24676 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for ); Fri, 16 Dec 1994 17:01:24 -0500 Message-Id: <199412162201.AA24676@nfs1.digex.net> Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4802; Fri, 16 Dec 94 16:58:25 EST Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8196; Fri, 16 Dec 1994 15:05:59 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Dec 1994 19:52:27 +0000 Reply-To: ucleaar Sender: Lojban list From: ucleaar Subject: Re: scope of zo To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu In-Reply-To: (Your message of Fri, 16 Dec 94 04:36:58 EST.) <199412160936.AA24965@access3.digex.net> Status: RO > Since "mav" is a name in Lojban, it will be followed by a pause in spoeech. > Therefore it will not glue onto the following word. This is why names must be followed by a pause. > > "zo mla" is ungrammatical, since "mla" is not a Lojban word. You would need > zoi delimited quotes to make it work. "zo" in general should not be used > with rafsi. Try lu myly.abu li'u as another alternative. Is a word nothing but an autonomous string of lerfu? Are the rafsi mav and the cmevla mav both zo mav.? Are the gismu gerku and the cmene gerku both zo gerku? --- And