From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu Sat Dec 17 13:45:13 1994
Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by nfs2.digex.net with SMTP id AA21007
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>); Sat, 17 Dec 1994 13:45:09 -0500
Message-Id: <199412171845.AA21007@nfs2.digex.net>
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 8855; Sat, 17 Dec 94 13:42:32 EST
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3302; Sat, 17 Dec 1994 13:42:16 -0500
Date:         Sat, 17 Dec 1994 13:44:55 EST
Reply-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Subject:      Re: scope of zo
To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
Status: RO

la djan cusku di'e

> However, in general, quoting rafsi with "zo" is a bad idea, because "zo"
> is meant for words, and rafsi are not words.  Better "zoi rafsi. mav .rafsi".

zoi rafsi raf rafsi rafsi zo rafsi


co'o mi'e xorxes