From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu Fri Dec 16 16:47:57 1994
Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by nfs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA23321
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>); Fri, 16 Dec 1994 16:47:54 -0500
Message-Id: <199412162147.AA23321@nfs1.digex.net>
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 4656; Fri, 16 Dec 94 16:46:44 EST
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 5487; Fri, 16 Dec 1994 14:49:59 -0500
Date:         Fri, 16 Dec 1994 19:38:17 +0000
Reply-To: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject:      Re: scope of zo
To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
In-Reply-To:  (Your message of Thu, 15 Dec 94 19:41:14 EST.)
Status: RO

> >   zo mla rafsi   vs.   zo mlarafsi
>
> You can't do it, because "mla" is not a lojban word.
> CCV rafsi are discriminated against, they can't be quoted with {zo}

Is this because "mav" could be a cmevla, but "mla" couldn't be?

---
And