Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rElYT-00007GC; Tue, 6 Dec 94 00:06 EET Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 0595; Tue, 06 Dec 94 00:06:58 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 0592; Tue, 6 Dec 1994 00:06:57 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4875; Mon, 5 Dec 1994 23:03:33 +0100 Date: Mon, 5 Dec 1994 16:56:06 EST Reply-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Sender: Lojban list From: Jorge Llambias Subject: Re: cmavo hit-list X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 689 Lines: 16 la lojbab cusku di'e > I would not use "du'u" in a bridi based on "senva". We don't dream about > the facts of a matter - rather we free-associate around ideas. If your > thinking is logical, and the truth/reality of each bridi is important, then > "du'u" is the word of cjhoice. When you think about something, and the > importance is the concept, and not whether it is, or even could be, true > or real, then "si'o" is the preferred word. So, I would have to use si'o for senva, pensi, xanri, etc and du'u for djuno, krici, jinvi? Is there any case where depending on which one I use the meaning changes, or is it just that si'o goes with some selbri and du'u with others? Jorge