Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rIM0J-00007DC; Thu, 15 Dec 94 21:38 EET
Message-Id: <m0rIM0J-00007DC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 3684; Thu, 15 Dec 94 21:38:33 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 3682; Thu, 15 Dec 1994 21:38:31 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6920; Thu, 15 Dec 1994 20:34:56 +0100
Date:         Thu, 15 Dec 1994 19:06:09 +0000
Reply-To:     ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      scope of zo
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 237
Lines: 16

> zo mav rafsi zo mavji

What distinguishes this from

  zo mavrafsi zo mavji ...

or

  zo ma vrafsi [supposing there is a rafsi vra]

? "mavrafsi" fails tosmabru test, so change example to:

  zo mla rafsi   vs.   zo mlarafsi

---
And