Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by nfs2.digex.net with SMTP id AA02113
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>); Wed, 14 Dec 1994 17:07:08 -0500
Message-Id: <199412142207.AA02113@nfs2.digex.net>
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 2050; Wed, 14 Dec 94 17:06:29 EST
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8905; Wed, 14 Dec 1994 14:30:53 -0500
Date:         Wed, 14 Dec 1994 14:32:08 EST
Reply-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Subject:      Re: jei
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@access.digex.net>
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Wed Dec 14 17:07:12 1994
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu

> > What would have been nice is that {du'u} be a monosyllable, but I guess
> > it's too late for that.
>
> You always have the option of speaking a different dialect of Lojban &
> hoping it catches on. For example, you could start using "jei" as a
> general replacement of "duhu".
> ---
> And

No, that would be too confusing. It's hard enough as it is to protest
against the double meaning that {jei} has had. It would be impossible
if I started using it with a third meaning.

Jorge