Received: from mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU by nfs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA23288 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for ); Sun, 18 Dec 1994 23:57:21 -0500 Received: from speech.linguistics.unimelb.EDU.AU by mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU with SMTP (5.83--+1.3.1+0.50); id AA07408 Mon, 19 Dec 1994 15:57:05 +1100 (from nsn@speech.language.unimelb.edu.au) Received: by speech (5.0) id AA00988; Mon, 19 Dec 1994 15:58:17 --1000 From: nsn@speech.language.unimelb.edu.au (Nick Legend Nicholas) Message-Id: <9412190458.988@speech.language.unimelb.edu.au> Subject: Re: Q-kau To: lojbab@access.digex.net Date: Mon, 19 Dec 1994 15:58:16 +1100 (EST) Cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu (Lojban Mailing List) In-Reply-To: from "Logical Language Group" at Dec 15, 94 01:34:34 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 2122 Status: RO X-From-Space-Date: Sun Dec 18 23:57:33 1994 X-From-Space-Address: nsn@speech.language.unimelb.edu.au Hu'tegh! nuq ja' Logical Language Group jay'? =BTW, I am also interested in how a language with totally free word order =handles the quantificational problems. Esperanto claims to have totally free =word order - how does it deal with "Everybody loves somebody" with object =first? Any other order-free languages provide insights? Esperanto, do something non-ropno? Come on! :) Both Esperanto and Modern Greek yield no surprises when it comes to quantification: Modern Greek: Oli tus aghapane kapion all (nom.) of them they love somebody (acc.) All of them love somebody (\A x \E y) Kapion aghapane oli tus Somebody is loved by all of them (\E y \A x) --- defeasible, I think. (i.e. context can force the other reading) Kapios aghapiete ap' olus tus somebody (nom.) is loved by all of them Somebody is loved by all of them (\E y \A x) Esperanto (the Full Analytic Grammar doesn't bother to investigate this behaviour): Cxiu amas iun everybody (nom.) love somebody (acc.) All of them love somebody (\A x \E y) Iun amas cxiu Probably same story as with Greek. Iu estas amata de cxiu somebody (nom.) is loved by everybody Somebody is loved by all of them (\E y \A x) Of course, the best place to ask is something like the massively non-configurational (i.e. anything goes in word order) Australian languages. Btw, yes, I'm still here. It's been a very hectic month with my thesis, and it will be another couple of hectic months programming at Microsoft coming up. But when all is done, I think I'll have a couple of tidbits from Greek to report, concerning the veriidicality and presuppositions with lonu vs. lenu... -- @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ Nick Nicholas. Melbourne University, Aus. nsn@speech.language.unimelb.edu.au --- "Some of the English might say that the Irish orthography is very Irish. Personally, I have a lot of respect for a people who can create something so grotesque." -- Andrew Rosta , <9307262008.AA95951@link-1.ts.bcc.ac.uk>