Received: from access1.digex.net by nfs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA18708
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <lojbab@nfs1.digex.net>); Thu, 8 Dec 1994 05:45:14 -0500
Received: by access1.digex.net id AA04924
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for lojbab); Thu, 8 Dec 1994 05:45:13 -0500
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 1994 05:45:13 -0500
From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
Message-Id: <199412081045.AA04924@access1.digex.net>
To: lojbab@access.digex.net, lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
Subject: jei
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Thu Dec  8 05:45:16 1994
X-From-Space-Address: lojbab

Jorge responds to me:
>> which is not far removed from "I know "what" the truth value of [bridi] is"
>
>As long as you use the {tu'a} I have no problem with it. But then {du'u xukau}
>only has one more syllable, and is much more explicit.

I could have put the abstraction in x3 of djuno and omitted the tu'a

The value of jei would come in discussions of logic when you might want
to explicitly say 

li pa jei broda

I don't think

li pa du'u xukau broda
has the same meaning, so the two are not synonymous.  (indeed I have no
idea what the latter means %^)

lojbab