Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by nfs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA14190
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>); Thu, 15 Dec 1994 17:06:27 -0500
Message-Id: <199412152206.AA14190@nfs1.digex.net>
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 0984; Thu, 15 Dec 94 17:04:20 EST
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6859; Thu, 15 Dec 1994 12:12:22 -0500
Date:         Thu, 15 Dec 1994 12:08:36 -0500
Reply-To: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CS.COLUMBIA.EDU>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CS.COLUMBIA.EDU>
Subject:      Re: plural
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@access.digex.net>
In-Reply-To:  <199412151644.LAA21421@cs.columbia.edu> (message from Logical
              Language Group on Thu, 15 Dec 1994 11:42:45 -0500)
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Thu Dec 15 17:06:36 1994
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu

>Date:         Thu, 15 Dec 1994 11:42:45 -0500
>From: Logical Language Group <lojbab%ACCESS.DIGEX.NET@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU>
>X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu

>Well, you are right, but you are drawing the wrong conclusions.  Specifically,
>Veijo's remark that "{go'i} doesn't replicate the {na}" is incorrect.
>A bare "go'i" without any NA ("na" or "ja'a") replicates any "na" in the
>referent, but if an explicit NA is present before the "go'i", it overrides
>any NA in the referent.  Thus:

Got it.  OK, that makes sense.

>--
>John Cowan              sharing account <lojbab@access.digex.net> for now
>          e'osai ko sarji la lojban.

~mark