From: Logical Language Group Message-Id: <199412051829.AA08399@access2.digex.net> Subject: Re: Outside quantifiers on masses Date: Mon, 5 Dec 1994 13:29:02 -0500 (EST) Cc: lojbab@access.digex.net (Logical Language Group) In-Reply-To: <199411120423.AA27849@nfs2.digex.net> from "Jorge Llambias" at Nov 11, 94 07:32:59 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24beta] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 555 Status: RO X-From-Space-Date: Mon Dec 5 13:29:21 1994 X-From-Space-Address: lojbab mi pu mabla cusku di'e > > Consider that mass as a mass of cells. 10% of a person is a dead person, > > but 100% of that mass is alive; 90% may or may not be alive. la xorxes. cusku di'e > I don't see why 10% of a person is a dead person, and I don't understand > what the example shows, either. I was muddled. I meant, of course, that 10% of a person, when severed from the remaining 90%, can't remain alive long. This claim is true but not relevant. -- John Cowan sharing account for now e'osai ko sarji la lojban.