Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rHmES-00007DC; Wed, 14 Dec 94 07:26 EET Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id HAA12355 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 1994 07:26:31 +0200 Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI (MAILER@FINHUTC) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-7 #2494) id <01HKMEVR1ES00001LX@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Wed, 14 Dec 1994 05:25:30 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 3712; Wed, 14 Dec 1994 07:26:39 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9322; Wed, 14 Dec 1994 06:23:17 +0100 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 1994 00:24:30 -0500 From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: Lojban prescriptivism? Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: Logical Language Group Message-id: <01HKMEVR2ASI0001LX@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU X-cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 369 Lines: 13 > mi na djuno le du'u makau se cmene <> > > >My sentence has the same number of syllables, and is more clear because >it doesn't need a {tu'a}. > >What would you expand yours to, if you had to make the tu'a explicit? Probably the same as yours. When I think x2 of djuno, I instinctively go tu'a sumti whereas you go ledu'u bridi. lojbab