Received: from access2.digex.net by nfs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA29583 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for ); Mon, 19 Dec 1994 15:11:04 -0500 Received: by access2.digex.net id AA09508 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for lojbab); Mon, 19 Dec 1994 15:10:44 -0500 From: Logical Language Group Message-Id: <199412192010.AA09508@access2.digex.net> Subject: Re: more on lehe & ka To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu (Lojban List) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 1994 15:10:44 -0500 (EST) Cc: lojbab@access.digex.net (Logical Language Group) In-Reply-To: <199411271232.AA09015@nfs2.digex.net> from "ucleaar" at Nov 27, 94 12:30:50 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24beta] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 638 Status: RO X-From-Space-Date: Mon Dec 19 15:11:08 1994 X-From-Space-Address: lojbab la .and. cusku di'e > I have been wondering whether the intention behind "ka" is that it > picks out defining properties, and behind "lehe" is that it picks > out nondefining properties. "lohe", perhaps, is supposed to pick > out both. I don't think so. "ka" and "lo'e" pick out actual properties, and "le'e picks out in-mind ones (which may or may not hold). I do not know how to express in Lojban the difference between "technically" and "regular", but they are surely discursives of some sort. "sa'e" probably helps cover the ground. -- John Cowan sharing account for now e'osai ko sarji la lojban.