Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rGEva-00007DC; Sat, 10 Dec 94 01:40 EET
Message-Id: <m0rGEva-00007DC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 2798; Sat, 10 Dec 94 01:40:56 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 2796; Sat, 10 Dec 1994 01:40:56 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9060; Sat, 10 Dec 1994 00:37:37 +0100
Date:         Fri, 9 Dec 1994 18:42:44 EST
Reply-To:     jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject:      Re: plural
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 617
Lines: 15

> > How do you say "the men carried the piano" in Lojban WITHOUT making
> > the individual/group distinction?
>
> I don't think you can avoid making this distinction. BUT "lei nanmu
> carried the piano" can have a distributive interpretation, since the
> mass inherits all properties of its members.

If {lei nanmu pu bevri le pipno} can have the distributive interpretation,
then there is no way to clearly express the group interpretation.

Let's be a bit more concrete: {lei nanmu pu paroi bevri le pipno} claims
that the piano was carried only once. How do you get a distributive
interpretation from that?

Jorge