Return-Path: Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rIZqp-00007DC; Fri, 16 Dec 94 12:25 EET Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id MAA22630 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 1994 12:25:06 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (MAILER@SEARN) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-7 #2494) id <01HKPHVOYO8G0007UL@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Fri, 16 Dec 1994 10:24:08 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0441; Fri, 16 Dec 1994 11:21:56 +0100 Date: Fri, 16 Dec 1994 12:22:34 +0200 From: Veijo Vilva Subject: Re: some help needed Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Message-id: <01HKPHVPIDPI0007UL@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 680 Lines: 32 la lojbab cusku di'e > Date: Fri, 16 Dec 1994 05:12:15 -0500 > From: Logical Language Group > Subject: Re: some help needed > >> What is the difference (except in brevity, of course; I'm not talking about >> that now) between >> >> da, as defined by {da poi du'u broda}, and >> >> ko'a, as defined by {lo goi ko'a du'u broda} >> >>co'o mi'e. goran. > > Well, your second sentence is ungrammatical. Not so. {lo goi ko'a du'u broda} is a legal (= parsing), preposed relative form of {lo du'u broda goi ko'a} > lojbab -- co'o mi'e veion --------------------------------- .i mi du la'o sy. Veijo Vilva sy. ---------------------------------