Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rGFYn-00007DC; Sat, 10 Dec 94 02:21 EET
Message-Id: <m0rGFYn-00007DC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 3202; Sat, 10 Dec 94 02:21:28 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 3199; Sat, 10 Dec 1994 02:21:27 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0241; Sat, 10 Dec 1994 01:18:07 +0100
Date:         Sat, 10 Dec 1994 00:19:48 +0000
Reply-To:     ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
Subject:      Re: 'metalogical descriptions'
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
In-Reply-To:  (Your message of Fri, 09 Dec 94 13:08:33 EST.)
Content-Length: 435
Lines: 13

Thanks,* Mark for dihe:
[*I daren't risk the thanks UI, because I textually confuse it with the
textual confusion UI]
> >How do we say things like
> >  the predicate Gerku has 2 places [NB NOT the word 'gerku']
> loi du'u gerku cu bridi fi reda

Isn't loi duhu gerku a predication, a bridi, rather than a predicate,
a selbri? Say we took the example "I defined the predicate Flombo":
we don't want "I defined lo duhu flombo".

---
And