Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rIKex-00007DC; Thu, 15 Dec 94 20:12 EET Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 1021; Thu, 15 Dec 94 20:12:26 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 1017; Thu, 15 Dec 1994 20:12:24 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8523; Thu, 15 Dec 1994 18:16:37 +0100 Date: Thu, 15 Dec 1994 12:08:36 -0500 Reply-To: "Mark E. Shoulson" Sender: Lojban list From: "Mark E. Shoulson" Subject: Re: plural X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva In-Reply-To: <199412151644.LAA21421@cs.columbia.edu> (message from Logical Language Group on Thu, 15 Dec 1994 11:42:45 -0500) Content-Length: 660 Lines: 17 >Date: Thu, 15 Dec 1994 11:42:45 -0500 >From: Logical Language Group >X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu >Well, you are right, but you are drawing the wrong conclusions. Specifically, >Veijo's remark that "{go'i} doesn't replicate the {na}" is incorrect. >A bare "go'i" without any NA ("na" or "ja'a") replicates any "na" in the >referent, but if an explicit NA is present before the "go'i", it overrides >any NA in the referent. Thus: Got it. OK, that makes sense. >-- >John Cowan sharing account for now > e'osai ko sarji la lojban. ~mark