Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rFUrj-00006wC; Thu, 8 Dec 94 00:29 EET
Message-Id: <m0rFUrj-00006wC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 1290; Thu, 08 Dec 94 00:29:53 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 1287; Thu, 8 Dec 1994 00:29:52 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE
 (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 7198; Wed, 7 Dec 1994 23:26:36 +0100
Date:         Wed, 7 Dec 1994 17:31:44 EST
Reply-To:     jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
Subject:      Re: TECH:  existential quantification
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 469
Lines: 12

la i,n cusku di'e

> I would like to be able to distinguish
> in a relatively straightforward manner between the concrete event "I swim
> (in the XYZ indoor swimming pool between 11:00 and 12:00 on Wednesday the
> 7th of December etc.)" and the abstract event "I swim".

What you describe (which I've deleted) is what I understand as the
difference between transparent and opaque reference. I would refer to
those two as {lo nu mi limna} and {lo'e nu mi limna}.

Jorge