Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rEo7V-00007GC; Tue, 6 Dec 94 02:51 EET Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 3587; Tue, 06 Dec 94 02:51:18 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 3583; Tue, 6 Dec 1994 02:51:17 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3299; Tue, 6 Dec 1994 01:48:01 +0100 Date: Tue, 6 Dec 1994 00:47:02 +0000 Reply-To: ucleaar Sender: Lojban list From: ucleaar Subject: lo terspu be la Nik. .e la Xorxes .e la Goran X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 2132 Lines: 67 Nick: > Hu'tegh! nuq ja' ucleaar jay'? > .i .u'i ko krici la'edi'e doi .and .i mi pu je caca'o srera smadi le mu'u > nu zo tra rafsi zo traji .i ku'i mi na fu'i ca'o birti leka mi carmi lojbo... Cumki fa le duhu le ka do klinga cu zmadu fi lo ka carmi - dahinaipei? XU do doi Nik. penmi le selnei gihe pendo vau be mi beho pohu lehi kosta gehu ku la melbi borno tcadu ckule bantadni stura? Jorge: > And: > > [What is "iseju"?] > Sentence logical connector. It says that the second sentence > is true whether or not the first one is. (seju is the reverse of ju.) > Something like "in any case". I don't know how you could work that out from the cmavo list. > > Mi .uu.uhu fe dahu cu dracki > > ehe nai lo ba se te se facki > > be lo jmifri co jakne > > (noi pehi na lakne) > > beho fo le vi selsku djusacki: > > i ki'e doi and le do sidju > cu tolpunji mi le manmidju > i le sacki pu banzu > le nu snada ganzu > lei cizra je cfipu vlabidju O joy! thou hast let there be light: with revelatory powers of sight my ken thou hast furnished, and lo! here shine burnished thy jewels macaronic and bright... > > > > Dehe remoi cu se ja te temci > > > 1. You have two selbri in the first line. > > Oh dear. Can we change it to "remoi ku" then? "A second occasion". > Nope, that's not a sumti. {ca lo remoi ku} would be "at the time of > a second something". But what you really want is {rere'u}, where > {re'u} is the ordinal ROI, not quite official yet. I hadn't realized moi wasn't an ordinal roi! > Also, {se ja te temci} is probably not what you meant. {seja} means the > same as {ja}, because it is a symmetric connector. Would "seljavtertemci" make a difference? How does one conjoin members of SE (surely something one might often wish to do)? Goran: > le cinla cu prenu bleplana > gi'e fo lenu cy. cmana > co simlu gi'e grasu > kei roroi se ckasu > ba lenu porpi lo ckana On fatness that beanpole is slim, yet he gets made to look far from trim, like a mountain of gunge, by the earthquaking plunge of the bed going crunch under him. --- And