Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rF6nq-00007GC; Tue, 6 Dec 94 22:48 EET Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 8418; Tue, 06 Dec 94 22:48:14 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 8416; Tue, 6 Dec 1994 22:48:09 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 7671; Tue, 6 Dec 1994 21:44:24 +0100 Date: Tue, 6 Dec 1994 15:38:40 EST Reply-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Sender: Lojban list From: Jorge Llambias Subject: Re: lo terspu be la Nik. .e la Xorxes .e la Goran X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 1077 Lines: 32 And: > > > [What is "iseju"?] > > Sentence logical connector. It says that the second sentence > > is true whether or not the first one is. (seju is the reverse of ju.) > > Something like "in any case". > > I don't know how you could work that out from the cmavo list. Probably seju should be listed, like janai, jonai, etc. already are. > I hadn't realized moi wasn't an ordinal roi! Well, it isn't. That's why we need {re'u}. > > Also, {se ja te temci} is probably not what you meant. {seja} means the > > same as {ja}, because it is a symmetric connector. > > Would "seljavtertemci" make a difference? How does one conjoin members > of SE (surely something one might often wish to do)? Whyever would one wish to do that? You can always say {se temci ja te temci}, but I don't really see a need for a more compact form. The lujvo is probably understandable too. > XU do doi Nik. penmi le selnei gihe pendo vau be mi beho pohu lehi kosta > gehu ku la melbi borno tcadu ckule bantadni stura? la melbi borno ???? co'o mi'e xorxes (to noi ciska to'o la pitsi burgo toi)