Return-Path: Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rUibh-00007SC; Thu, 19 Jan 95 00:12 EET Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id AAA11277 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 1995 00:12:01 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (MAILER@SEARN) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-13 #2494) id <01HM0A7YF7F40012PU@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Wed, 18 Jan 1995 22:11:24 +0200 (EET) Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4048; Wed, 18 Jan 1995 23:08:35 +0100 Date: Wed, 18 Jan 1995 14:15:47 -0400 From: Victor F Sirvent E Subject: blanu blari'o Sender: Lojban list Reply-to: Victor F Sirvent E Message-id: <01HM0A7YHM2Q0012PU@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT To: LOJBAN@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 589 Lines: 18 I have been learning lojban through the draft textbook and other materials that I got from The Logical Language group, in particular the `diagrammed summary of lojban grammar forms with examples sentences' (April 1992). I found a discrepancy between this two texts. In the first is listed the gismu {blanu} (blue) (Also I found it in the official gismu list), but in the second text, other gismu is given for the same idea {blari'o}. I understand that in lojban there is only ONE gismu for one idea. Is {blari'o} a non-official gismu?. co'o mi'e viktor Victor Sirvent vsirvent@usb.ve