Return-Path: Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rVTeS-00007TC; Sat, 21 Jan 95 02:26 EET Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id CAA28307 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 1995 02:25:58 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (MAILER@SEARN) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-13 #2494) id <01HM37BR1TN400068G@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Sat, 21 Jan 1995 00:21:19 +0200 (EET) Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2106; Sat, 21 Jan 1995 01:21:19 +0100 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 1995 17:20:13 -0500 (EST) From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Subject: Re: ago (LONG and la'a incorrect :)) Sender: Lojban list Reply-to: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Message-id: <01HM37BR2X7M00068G@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 2475 Lines: 77 coi goran > > i drata i ku'i le'i go'i ku ku'a le'i se go'i na du le gunti > > .i gunti ki'a i oise'i zo kunti i le kunti cu se cmima noda ........... > > Is it really so weird? I thought it was more or less evident. > > Given that {ki} marks the origin, all I meant was that {le ckule} > > was the origin. > > It ba'e marks the origin. It takes the origin as stated by another > tense marker and makes it ba'e stick. That's why it's called sticky > tense marker, or tense default marker. And doesn't that imply that its sumti complement has to become the origin? What else could it mean? > But I still don't think ZI/VA classes are not useful > as they are. Tell me, which FAhA would you use for 'somewhere around > the school, not too far' which is what {va le ckule} conveys? {to'o le ckule}, which you and Lojbab didn't like. To me, if {lei verba cu kelci to'o le ckule} implies that the playing faces away from the school, then {lei verba cu kelci zu'a le ckule} implies that it faces left of the school. I thought that the FAhAs show the position of the event relative to the origin, and not where the event faces. > What we already have does not do the job. We have two options: > 1) make new, completely different definitions for existing cmavo Completely different? No cmavo would change meaning. Only the constructions "ZI " and "VA " would change meaning. > xorxes proposes that we change the meaning of {VI/ZI } to > mean the distance rather that offset, [Note on vocabulary: "offset" means the same as "displacement" to me. I propose that the sumti be the displacement (or offset) instead of the origin.] > so that we can express those > sentences as > > lei verba cu kelci va lo mitre beli cino > mi klama lo zarci za lo djedi beli re > > I don't know how he proposes to translate "The children are playing > around the school", lei verba cu kelci ru'u le ckule > much less "The children are playing 30 metres > from the school". lei verba cu kelci to'o le ckule va lei cino mitre > xorxes, your turn. (I hope I did not misquote > your thoughts.) Only slightly mis. :) > co'o mi'e. goran. noi darsi co ciksi loi sidbo befi la xorxes. vau vau zo'o co'o mi'e xorxes noi zanru le nu la goran ciksi sy zo'onaicai > to .u'i .i lo'u vau vau le'u xajmi gi'eri'abo se fanva fi la gliban. > lo bangrxrvatska zoi gy. Wuff! Wuff! .gy. .u'i toi i bau la sanban lo'e gerku cu cusku zoi sy !guau, guau! sy