Return-Path: Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rTVrb-00007SC; Sun, 15 Jan 95 16:23 EET Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id QAA05119 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 1995 16:23:26 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (MAILER@SEARN) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-13 #2494) id <01HLVMYYGHHS000BZ9@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Sun, 15 Jan 1995 14:22:48 +0200 (EET) Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 7229; Sun, 15 Jan 1995 15:20:06 +0100 Date: Sun, 15 Jan 1995 14:22:29 +0000 From: ucleaar Subject: Re: plurality In-reply-to: (Your message of Sat, 14 Jan 95 17:50:52 EST.) Sender: Lojban list Reply-to: ucleaar Message-id: <01HLVMYYHMXU000BZ9@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 343 Lines: 11 Jorge: > The problem that I see (at least one of the problems), is that the default > quantifier of {lei} is {pisu'o} instead of {piro}. A further option, which I prefer, is that there is no default "quantifier" for lei & loi. (i.e. no default massifier) The unspecified massifier should be, as John would say, glorked from context. --- And