Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by nfs2.digex.net with SMTP id AA06175
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>); Sun, 15 Jan 1995 09:23:44 -0500
Message-Id: <199501151423.AA06175@nfs2.digex.net>
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 3409; Sun, 15 Jan 95 09:25:36 EST
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 7052; Sun, 15 Jan 1995 09:25:20 -0500
Date:         Sun, 15 Jan 1995 14:22:29 +0000
Reply-To: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject:      Re: plurality
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@access.digex.net>
In-Reply-To:  (Your message of Sat, 14 Jan 95 17:50:52 EST.)
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Sun Jan 15 09:23:47 1995
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu

Jorge:
> The problem that I see (at least one of the problems), is that the default
> quantifier of {lei} is {pisu'o} instead of {piro}.

A further option, which I prefer, is that there is no default "quantifier"
for lei & loi. (i.e. no default massifier) The unspecified massifier
should be, as John would say, glorked from context.

---
And