Return-Path: Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rWIcY-00007TC; Mon, 23 Jan 95 08:51 EET Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id IAA05871 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 1995 08:51:04 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (MAILER@SEARN) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-13 #2494) id <01HM6DD3QQDC000CV2@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Mon, 23 Jan 1995 06:46:36 +0200 (EET) Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6097; Mon, 23 Jan 1995 07:47:41 +0100 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 1995 06:47:57 +0000 From: ucleaar Subject: Re: replies re. ka & mamta be ma In-reply-to: (Your message of Mon, 23 Jan 95 00:40:56 EST.) <199501230540.AA24100@access1.digex.net> Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: ucleaar Message-id: <01HM6DD4DEYE000CV2@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 366 Lines: 11 > I just checked versions of the cmavo list from 4/93 and 8/93 and neither > meantions an x2 for "ka". Are youi sure you are reading correctly? I can't check the file now. I wouldn't have thought [bridi] was x2. I am quite willing to accept that now, at any rate, {ka} has no x2. Does lihi have an x2? I'd have thought ka and lihi should behave the same. --- And