Return-Path: Received: from fiport.funet.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rZ7Oc-00007eC; Tue, 31 Jan 95 03:28 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (MAILER@SEARN) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-13 #2494) id <01HMH7K2UH34001Q4Y@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Tue, 31 Jan 1995 00:59:09 +0200 (EET) Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2567; Tue, 31 Jan 1995 02:00:08 +0100 Date: Mon, 30 Jan 1995 20:04:48 -0500 (EST) From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Subject: Re: ago Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Message-id: <01HMH7K3QXX2001Q4Y@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu Content-Length: 369 Lines: 10 la and cusku di'e > That all seems well and good. I merely wonder whether there is a rule > that says the ZI specifies the displacement of the most recent PU. > Is it always unambiguous which PU any ZI specifies the displacement of? i na ka'e se senpi va'o le nu zo pu joi zo zi tagji jorne lo selbri i mi sruma le du'u mintu va'o le nu sumti tcita co'o mi'e xorxes