Return-Path: Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rTfnK-00007SC; Mon, 16 Jan 95 02:59 EET Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id CAA24864 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 1995 02:59:39 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (MAILER@SEARN) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-13 #2494) id <01HLW96PHITC000M5E@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Mon, 16 Jan 1995 00:59:00 +0200 (EET) Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 1558; Mon, 16 Jan 1995 01:56:14 +0100 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 1995 01:58:15 +0100 (MET) From: Goran Topic Subject: Re: More info on "voi" Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: Goran Topic Message-id: <01HLW96QHW8M000M5E@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: Lojban Listserv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 897 Lines: 26 > I can't find anything describing the use of "voi" in the draft reference > grammar papers or in the textbook. Is there anywhere else I should look for > info or is the use of "voi" undocumented online? > > Thanks > ____ > Chris Bogart \ / ftp://ftp.csn.org/cbogart/html/homepage.html > Quetzal Consulting \/ cbogart@quetzal.com lo nanmu voi ninmu cu klama A man who-I-describe-as woman goes. A man, whom I saw as womanish, went. Not much confusion, as I saw it. {voi} is to {poi} like {le} to {lo}. I think I saw it mentioned once that there were three more grammar papers still waiting to be written. One of them is, if my memory serves me, the one on relative clauses. co'o mi'e. goran. -- Learn languages! The more langs you know, the more incomprehensible you can get e'udoCILreleiBANgu.izo'ozo'onairoBANguteDJUnobedocubanRI'a.ailekadonaka'eSELjmi