Return-Path: Received: from fiport.funet.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rYrwa-00007eC; Mon, 30 Jan 95 10:58 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (MAILER@SEARN) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-13 #2494) id <01HMG9UPPXKW000ZVK@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Mon, 30 Jan 1995 08:54:12 +0200 (EET) Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 7551; Mon, 30 Jan 1995 09:55:12 +0100 Date: Mon, 30 Jan 1995 02:53:37 -0500 From: "Arthur X. Nghiem" Subject: Lojban [Re: definitional debates] Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: arthur.nghiem@UTMB.EDU Message-id: <01HMG9UQMQNQ000ZVK@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: LOJBAN@CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU Content-Length: 2038 Lines: 55 > On Sun, 29 Jan 1995 arthur.nghiem@utmb.edu wrote: > >"hyper religious." > > > > > > This is a symptom, not a diagnosis. > > ^^^^^^^ > > I saw your discourse with on this. > > My Random House Dictionary has both your and definition > > next to it. > > What does your medical dictionary say? That's where to look, since we're > talking about medicine here. Medical Library is replete with various > ones, and I've got both a Dorland's and a Stedman's in my office you're > free to consult. > > This is one instance in which I'd be *very* surprised if Dr. > disagreed with what I wrote. OTOH, as you point out, hyperreligiosity > comes much closer to meeting the definition I use for 'sign,' not > 'symptom.' I've never heard a patient complain of feeling hyperreligious > except in retrospect. So it may also be the case that I disagree with what > I wrote... > > I believe it is proper for the scientific MH community to ban the > > use of both "symptom" and "sign." > > What would you have us use? Especially since Dr. insists > everything psychiatric is a symptom? > > > What are the latin equivalents? > > These are anglicized Latin terms to begin with. Symptom from sinthoma and > sign from signum. This is medical Latin, however, and the ancients used > indicium or signum, since they didn't tend to pay much attention to what > patients said. > Dear Lojban Speakers, I would like to find out the unambiguous Lojban terms that can replace "sign" and "symptom." A "sign" being a positive indicator of MH problem. A "symptom" being a cause for suspicion. Please discuss this amongs yourselves on "LOJBAN@CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU" where I can watch the discussion. BTW There may "signs" and "symptoms" that are culturally base and some that definately are not. Possibly making four terms needed. Maybe even more! I wish to report your consensus to the party I was addressing. Thank you, Arthur Nghiem P.S. Please don't change the Subject title on this thread.