Return-Path: Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rVkUu-00007TC; Sat, 21 Jan 95 20:25 EET Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id UAA29696 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 1995 20:25:16 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (MAILER@SEARN) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-13 #2494) id <01HM4913TJG0000EGX@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Sat, 21 Jan 1995 18:20:48 +0200 (EET) Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 7095; Sat, 21 Jan 1995 19:21:56 +0100 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 1995 13:27:32 -0500 (EST) From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Subject: Re: ki le ckule Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Message-id: <01HM4913VDDE000EGX@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 684 Lines: 24 la lojbab cusku di'e > >> I have NO idea what that "ki" is supposed to mean. > > > >Is it really so weird? I thought it was more or less evident. > >Given that {ki} marks the origin, all I meant was that {le ckule} > >was the origin. > > Ah maybe you wanted > "viki le ckule ko'a va kelci" Not really. I wanted the origin to be the school, not a short distance from it. > >What does {ki le ckule} mean, then? Or is that another of those > >meaningless constructions that And likes so much? :) > > Probably "do'eki le ckule", whatever that means ... Perhaps fixing the origin at {le ckule}? I can't see it meaning anything else, and that meaning seems almost self evident. Jorge