Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by nfs2.digex.net with SMTP id AA24329 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for ); Fri, 20 Jan 1995 18:41:56 -0500 Message-Id: <199501202341.AA24329@nfs2.digex.net> Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 5812; Fri, 20 Jan 95 18:43:47 EST Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4617; Fri, 20 Jan 1995 17:18:15 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 1995 17:20:13 EST Reply-To: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Sender: Lojban list From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU Subject: Re: ago (LONG and la'a incorrect :)) X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Bob LeChevalier Status: RO X-From-Space-Date: Fri Jan 20 18:41:59 1995 X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu coi goran > > i drata i ku'i le'i go'i ku ku'a le'i se go'i na du le gunti > > .i gunti ki'a i oise'i zo kunti i le kunti cu se cmima noda ........... > > Is it really so weird? I thought it was more or less evident. > > Given that {ki} marks the origin, all I meant was that {le ckule} > > was the origin. > > It ba'e marks the origin. It takes the origin as stated by another > tense marker and makes it ba'e stick. That's why it's called sticky > tense marker, or tense default marker. And doesn't that imply that its sumti complement has to become the origin? What else could it mean? > But I still don't think ZI/VA classes are not useful > as they are. Tell me, which FAhA would you use for 'somewhere around > the school, not too far' which is what {va le ckule} conveys? {to'o le ckule}, which you and Lojbab didn't like. To me, if {lei verba cu kelci to'o le ckule} implies that the playing faces away from the school, then {lei verba cu kelci zu'a le ckule} implies that it faces left of the school. I thought that the FAhAs show the position of the event relative to the origin, and not where the event faces. > What we already have does not do the job. We have two options: > 1) make new, completely different definitions for existing cmavo Completely different? No cmavo would change meaning. Only the constructions "ZI " and "VA " would change meaning. > xorxes proposes that we change the meaning of {VI/ZI } to > mean the distance rather that offset, [Note on vocabulary: "offset" means the same as "displacement" to me. I propose that the sumti be the displacement (or offset) instead of the origin.] > so that we can express those > sentences as > > lei verba cu kelci va lo mitre beli cino > mi klama lo zarci za lo djedi beli re > > I don't know how he proposes to translate "The children are playing > around the school", lei verba cu kelci ru'u le ckule > much less "The children are playing 30 metres > from the school". lei verba cu kelci to'o le ckule va lei cino mitre > xorxes, your turn. (I hope I did not misquote > your thoughts.) Only slightly mis. :) > co'o mi'e. goran. noi darsi co ciksi loi sidbo befi la xorxes. vau vau zo'o co'o mi'e xorxes noi zanru le nu la goran ciksi sy zo'onaicai > to .u'i .i lo'u vau vau le'u xajmi gi'eri'abo se fanva fi la gliban. > lo bangrxrvatska zoi gy. Wuff! Wuff! .gy. .u'i toi i bau la sanban lo'e gerku cu cusku zoi sy !guau, guau! sy