Received: from access2.digex.net by nfs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA29305 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for ); Tue, 3 Jan 1995 10:56:10 -0500 Received: by access2.digex.net id AA27300 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for lojbab); Tue, 3 Jan 1995 10:56:05 -0500 From: Logical Language Group Message-Id: <199501031556.AA27300@access2.digex.net> Subject: Re: Scope-leaping: xa'a, xa'anai (-> xo'u -> bo'u) To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu (Lojban List) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 1995 10:56:05 -0500 (EST) Cc: lojbab@access.digex.net (Logical Language Group) In-Reply-To: <199412222035.AA11363@nfs2.digex.net> from "ucleaar" at Dec 22, 94 07:59:09 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24beta] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 678 Status: RO X-From-Space-Date: Tue Jan 3 10:56:16 1995 X-From-Space-Address: lojbab la .and. cusku di'e > Since the effect of {xa'a}/{xa'anai} concerns ordering in the prenex > of the duhu expressed by the seduhu, and since in a seduhu the prenex > is marked by {zohu}, I suggest {bo'u} and {bo'unai} as the actual > cmavo. These are currently unassigned (according to my list). Unassigned they are, but also sacred, since "bo'V" is the only set of five cmavo remaining unassigned. Try something else. This is my list of unassigned cmavo, other than the bo'V series: bi'a bi'e ce'e ce'u ci'a ja'u ju'e ne'e pe'e re'a re'u te'i va'e zi'a zi'i zi'u (semi-sacred) -- John Cowan sharing account for now e'osai ko sarji la lojban.