Return-Path: Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rVkEZ-00007TC; Sat, 21 Jan 95 20:08 EET Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id UAA29195 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 1995 20:08:21 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (MAILER@SEARN) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-13 #2494) id <01HM48G4Y5VK000DZ3@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Sat, 21 Jan 1995 18:03:53 +0200 (EET) Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6621; Sat, 21 Jan 1995 19:05:02 +0100 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 1995 18:07:36 +0000 From: ucleaar Subject: Re: whiskey lovers In-reply-to: (Your message of Sat, 21 Jan 95 13:32:05 T.) Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: ucleaar Message-id: <01HM48G4YQLE000DZ3@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1319 Lines: 33 Goran: > There is no x2 in {ka}, at least in my vlaste. There is in my list, dated 6.1.93 and labelled as baselined at the start of the file. > I'd say it's the mutual property of all the terbri, I wouldn't know what a property is, then. > > > >> No, because there is no claim that the typical-generic englishman likes > > > >> whisky, though I concede that the claim is made that the typical-generic > > > >> englishman that likes whisky acquires the liking. > > > >Oh, you wanted THAT claim? :) Even simpler: {lo'e glipre cu pu'o vusnei > > > >la .uiskis.} should state that... Typical Englishman is (at least at one > > > >time) before beginning to like whiskey. > > > Goran is of course from a place thatuses perfective tenses, so I tend to > > > trust this. I would have said: > > > lo'e glipre cu binxo lo vusnei be la .uiskis. > > It should be {lohe glipre poi vusnei la .uiskis} or {lohe nu lo glipre > > vusnei la .uiskis}. No claim is being made about the typical Englishman, > > only about the typical E that likes whisky, or the liking for whisky > > of the typical E. > Decide what you want :) This interpretation was in my mail prior to this > attempt, one with {ja} between {pu'o} and {noroi}. I haven't changed my mind. So far, I think, your versions have just pertained to lohe glipre. --- And