Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by nfs1.digex.net with SMTP id AA24061
  (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>); Mon, 23 Jan 1995 01:50:47 -0500
Message-Id: <199501230650.AA24061@nfs1.digex.net>
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 7332; Mon, 23 Jan 95 01:52:39 EST
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@UGA) by UGA.CC.UGA.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 0349; Mon, 23 Jan 1995 01:52:39 -0500
Date:         Mon, 23 Jan 1995 06:47:57 +0000
Reply-To: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject:      Re: replies re. ka & mamta be ma
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@access.digex.net>
In-Reply-To:  (Your message of Mon,
              23 Jan 95 00:40:56 EST.) <199501230540.AA24100@access1.digex.net>
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Mon Jan 23 01:50:49 1995
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu

> I just checked versions of the cmavo list from 4/93 and 8/93 and neither
> meantions an x2 for "ka".  Are youi sure you are reading correctly?

I can't check the file now. I wouldn't have thought [bridi] was x2.
I am quite willing to accept that now, at any rate, {ka} has no x2.
Does lihi have an x2? I'd have thought ka and lihi should behave the
same.

---
And