From conlang@diku.dk Mon Feb 6 06:27:33 1995 Date: Mon, 6 Feb 1995 12:27:27 +0100 Message-Id: <9502061044.AA02558@nene.cl.cam.ac.uk> Comment: Issues related to constructed languages Originator: conlang@diku.dk Errors-To: thorinn@diku.dk Version: 5.5 -- Copyright (c) 1991/92, Anastasios Kotsikonas From: Edmund.Grimley-Evans@cl.cam.ac.uk Subject: sound symbolism I was thinking last night that it might be amusing to try an experiment concerning the "natural" allocation of meanings to sounds. The idea would be to agree on a phonology and a list of senses to be covered and to try to allocate the senses to words in as "natural" and mnemonic manner as possible. Ideally, the result would be a word list that bears no particular resemblance to an existing language but which is much easier to learn than a random list and perhaps as easy as a list based on Latin roots for a typical English speaker, say. I would like to do this with a very simple phonology - open syllables, 10 consonants, 5 vowels, total of 50 syllables, say. There would then be 50 monosyllabic words and 2500 bisyllabic words. One would definitely not want to allocate all of them at the start, so a list of 1000 concepts to be allocated to the bisyllabic words would be a realistic task. I would take the concepts from frequency lists; they would not include structural elements as it would be too difficult to decide what the structural elements should be, and some of them would be monosyllabic. Since cooperation in designing a conlang never works, it would be better to organise this as a competition. Unlike conlangs themselves, the results of this task would be directly comparable. Does anyone else think this is a stupid idea? Has it been done before? (Can anyone give references to a fairly complete word list created a priori according to a principle of sound symbolism rather than classification? The idea goes back to Comenius, so I'd be surprised if no one has ever tried to apply it in practice in all those intervening centuries, but I don't remember ever having seen such a list. Maybe, if we were to attempt it, we would see why no one has ever completed the task! Who knows?) Edmundo