Message-Id: <199502020023.AA26172@nfs1.digex.net>
From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed Feb  1 19:23:24 1995
Subject:      Re: replies re. ka & mamta be ma
X-From-Space-Date: Wed Feb  1 19:23:24 1995
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu

Jorge:
> i ro cmima be le se fancu cu ckini pa cmima be le te fancu
> le selbri

So, say, "friend" isn't a function, bcs one has more than friend?

> i pa po'o cmima be le te fancu  i la'edi'u vajni

Since you say it's important I'd better acknowledge that
I can't parse or understand it (if you mean {pa poho cmima
be le te fancu}).

> > > .i roda poi prenu zo'u da ponse lo ba'e su'onomei
> > So {da poi prenu zohu da ponse node} is false?
> na go'i  i lo su'onomei ka'e dunli lo nomei

Indeed so. The question is whether {mi ponse lo nomei ku e
no da} is a contradiction: I have no idea.

> > I feel [makau] doesn't increase expressive
> > power: it is an optional add-on, a useful convenience.
> ie i ku'i pe'i la'e di'u cu jetnu sera'a ro cmavo

Surely not most members of, say SE, LE, PA?

---
And