Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET> Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rijoS-00001pC; Sun, 26 Feb 95 16:19 EET Message-Id: Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 8814; Sun, 26 Feb 95 16:19:25 EET Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 8812; Sun, 26 Feb 1995 16:19:25 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6516; Sun, 26 Feb 1995 15:15:31 +0100 Date: Sun, 26 Feb 1995 09:16:54 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: indirect commands? X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Veijo Vilva Content-Length: 993 Lines: 21 Jorge and And have been going on about "kau" in essays that I won't pretend to understanbd in the 20 seconds maximum I seem to be able to give the typical email message these days. But a question came up that may involve "kau" in a different situation. But i am not sure it works. So, how to express (addressing George) "Tell John to meet Mary at the park." This is a recursive problem: "Tell John to tell Jim to tell Nora to tell Mary to meet me in the park." Nora points out that you can do the same thing with indirect questions as well ("Ask/tell John to ask Mary whether she will meet Jim in the park.") Does kokau work in these indirect commands? How does one keep straight who "ko" is in multiple levels of commands (I can easily modify that nested recursive command to have the same individual be at multiple levels.) "ko" with subscripts MIGHT work. Or is the problem middle of the night muddled thinking from someone who has been studying Russian too much lately? lojbab