Return-Path: Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0reR47-00001GC; Tue, 14 Feb 95 19:29 EET Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id TAA05679 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 1995 19:29:30 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (MAILER@SEARN) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-13 #2494) id <01HN1PSD0M8W000054@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Tue, 14 Feb 1995 17:22:31 +0200 (EET) Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 9857; Tue, 14 Feb 1995 18:05:58 +0100 Date: Tue, 14 Feb 1995 12:00:51 -0500 From: Logical Language Group Subject: Re: ago24 & replies In-reply-to: <199502140747.AA15720@nfs2.digex.net> from "jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU" at Feb 13, 95 10:23:07 pm Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: Logical Language Group Message-id: <01HN1Q046YG2000054@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: Lojban List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 414 Lines: 12 la xorxes. cusku di'e > As an aside, how do the tenses of subordinate bridi behave? Are they > absolute, or do they refer to the main bridi? They are relative to the main bridi. In earlier versions of the tense paper, I believed otherwise, but the historical rule has now been restored. -- John Cowan sharing account for now e'osai ko sarji la lojban.