Return-Path: Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0redcb-00001GC; Wed, 15 Feb 95 08:53 EET Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id IAA08860 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 1995 08:53:54 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (MAILER@SEARN) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-13 #2494) id <01HN2I2CRTKW0003SG@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Wed, 15 Feb 1995 06:47:35 +0200 (EET) Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 5803; Mon, 13 Feb 1995 03:32:59 +0100 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 1995 02:56:34 +0100 (MET) From: Goran Topic Subject: Double accusatives Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: Goran Topic Message-id: <01HN2I49CV7E0003SG@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-To: Lojban Listserv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 781 Lines: 26 > Does anyone happen to know if in, say, Latin or Russian, > or Finnish or whatever, you can have two accusatives (or two words > in the same case) in the same clause? .i ka'e go'i .i co'acme joi cmavo bo selbalvi valsi > If it's possible, what does it mean? lojban: .i mi xusra ledu'u do nolraitru to .i do nolraitru ca'e toi gliban: I pronounce you to be the emperor. la'oban: apello te (do, Acc) imperatorem (nolraitru Acc) bangrxrvatska: Proglas^avam te (do, Acc) carem (nolraitru, Acc) > Is there an implied "&"? .i na go'i .i lu gi'eca'e li'u pe'iru'e .enai zo gi'e vau co'o mi'e. goran. -- Learn languages! The more langs you know, the more incomprehensible you can get e'udoCILreleiBANgu.izo'ozo'onairoBANguteDJUnobedocubanRI'a.ailekadonaka'eSELjmi