From: Logical Language Group Message-Id: <199502241847.AA21727@access2.digex.net> Subject: Re: Board decision needed on Loglan/Lojban reciprocity Date: Fri, 24 Feb 1995 13:47:39 -0500 (EST) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From-Space-Date: Fri Feb 24 13:47:50 1995 X-From-Space-Address: lojbab lojbab cusku di'e > My main "objection" to reciprocation is that we have no other links to other > conlangs in the first place, whereass it sounds like Jennings is being > inclusionary in including us. Being our only external link, it would put > focus on TLI Loglan, whereass if we had a page linking to several other > conlangs it would stand out less. We could easily add links to Edmund Grimley-Evans's conlang page, and perhaps to the Esperanto page, thus: "If you want Esperanto, you can find it here." > But I am not sure I understand the psychology of Web-climbers weel enough to > know what they would feel about this. Is it the norm that home pages have > a bunch of links to othersites, or are the links to other sites normally > handled more at an index level? My perception is that it is normal to have a subpage called "Links to related sites" or some such, and that this page is populated with various external links. -- John Cowan sharing account for now e'osai ko sarji la lojban.