Return-Path: Received: from kantti.helsinki.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi with smtp (Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0redUv-00001GC; Wed, 15 Feb 95 08:46 EET Received: from fiport.funet.fi (fiport.funet.fi [128.214.109.150]) by kantti.helsinki.fi (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id IAA08069 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 1995 08:45:59 +0200 Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (MAILER@SEARN) by FIPORT.FUNET.FI (PMDF V4.3-13 #2494) id <01HN2HV6TPQO0009TI@FIPORT.FUNET.FI>; Wed, 15 Feb 1995 06:41:19 +0200 (EET) Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2865; Mon, 13 Feb 1995 08:20:04 +0100 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 1995 00:10:21 -0700 From: Chris Bogart Subject: Re: Double accusatives Sender: Lojban list To: Veijo Vilva Reply-to: Chris Bogart Message-id: <01HN2HVIXNMY0009TI@FIPORT.FUNET.FI> X-Envelope-to: veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 698 Lines: 24 >> Does anyone happen to know if in, say, Latin or Russian, >> or Finnish or whatever, you can have two accusatives (or two words >> in the same case) in the same clause? > >.i ka'e go'i .i co'acme joi cmavo bo selbalvi valsi .i mi di'u na jimpe .i co'acme ki'a .i bo ki'a >la'oban: apello te (do, Acc) imperatorem (nolraitru Acc) >bangrxrvatska: Proglas^avam te (do, Acc) carem (nolraitru, Acc) > >> Is there an implied "&"? > >.i na go'i >.i lu gi'eca'e li'u pe'iru'e .enai zo gi'e vau mi la'edi'u se spaji .i xu zoi ly. agricola amat puellam nautam ly. smuni ledu'u lo te cange cu prami lo nixli noi ca'e blosazri .i to .uuse'i mi le frili po'o ke latmo valsi cu djuno