Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0rhmZ0-00001pC; Fri, 24 Feb 95 01:03 EET
Message-Id: <m0rhmZ0-00001pC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 2786; Fri, 24 Feb 95 01:03:30 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 2783; Fri, 24 Feb 1995 01:03:30 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6012; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 23:59:37 +0100
Date:         Thu, 23 Feb 1995 18:06:08 EST
Reply-To:     jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Subject:      Re: status of lo/dapoi, here are some messages from the old thread
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To:           Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
Content-Length: 927
Lines: 32

> > It can't be the case that:
> >
> >         lo pavyseljirna cu pavyselcirna
> >         At least one unicorn is a unicorn.
> >
> > is true and at the same time:
>               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >         no da cu pavyselcirna
> >         There is nothing that is a unicorn.
> >
>
> .i kakne lenu le re jufra cu jetnu kei tu'a lo smuni vanbi drata

i go'i  i mi djica le nu cusku le sedu'u le re jufra na jetnu zu'i

>.i su'a
> ledu'u lu lo pavyseljirna cu pavyseljirna li'u jetnu cu natfe ledu'u lu
> lo noda cu pavyseljirna li'u ba'e va'opo'o le kampu munje

i pe'i go'i va'o ro munje vedu'o zu'i

> > The problem is not with {lo} or {da poi}, the problem is how
> > you define the selbri {pavyseljirna}.
>
> .i .ienai .i na nabmi fatu'a lo selbri velski
> .i sarcu faleku'i nu djuno lodu'u selsku va'omakau

i ie li'a  i ku'i va'o ro da lu lo broda li'u mintu lu da poi broda li'u

> co'o mi'e. goran.

co'o mi'e xorxes