Return-Path: <@FINHUTC.HUT.FI:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Received: from FINHUTC.hut.fi by xiron.pc.helsinki.fi  with smtp
	(Linux Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0roRdv-00007aC; Tue, 14 Mar 95 10:07 EET
Message-Id: <m0roRdv-00007aC@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi>
Received: from FINHUTC.HUT.FI by FINHUTC.hut.fi (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 2931; Tue, 14 Mar 95 10:07:50 EET
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin MAILER@SEARN) by FINHUTC.HUT.FI (LMail V1.1d/1.7f) with BSMTP id 2926; Tue, 14 Mar 1995 10:07:46 +0200
Received: from SEARN.SUNET.SE (NJE origin LISTSERV@SEARN) by SEARN.SUNET.SE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 5305; Tue, 14 Mar 1995 09:02:42 +0100
Date:         Tue, 14 Mar 1995 03:04:00 -0500
Reply-To:     Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Sender:       Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@FINHUTC.hut.fi>
From:         Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
Subject:      mo'e
To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
Content-Length: 363
Lines: 10

 >This suggests to me that {mo'e de} means "at least one de", where
>{de} could be apples, for example.
>
>Which one is right? If {mo'e de} means "some number de", then I can't
>imagine what {mo'e pa plise} could mean.

I was ellipsizing the restriction.  How about mo'e de poi namcu
(actually I might want namcu in the range 1-7 or something like that).

lojbab