From jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU  Sat Mar  6 22:46:39 2010
From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
Subject:      Re: On {lo} and existence
Date: Fri Mar 10 22:10:11 1995
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Fri Mar 10 22:10:11 1995
X-From-Space-Address: LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu
Message-ID: <UrlqHM_NkfE.A.mZG.Pv0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

la djan cusku di'e

> > {dahinai} = real. {dahi} = real or imaginary. "Real" means "real in the
> > universe of discourse". "Imaginary" means "not real in the universe of
> > discourse".
>
> Note that "xanri" does not mean "imaginary" in this sense, due to its x2;
> for something to be "imaginary" in the Lojban sense, there must exist an
> imaginer.

Can something be "imaginary" in And's sense without there being an
imaginer? I won't even try to imagine what that could be, or I would
spoil it.

Jorge